Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pope v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, The et al
as 1:2020cv00093
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, The, Briles, Jefferson County Detention Facility, The and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Glenn Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF F, et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH, et al
as 2:2001cv01652
Plaintiff:
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA, INC. , Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Consol_plaintiff:
AMY REICHERT , GREAT LAKES HEALTH PLAN, INC. , ROSEEN and others
Pecial_master:
STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Banks v. Obama et al
as 5:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Harley Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
United States of America, Elizabeth Foster, Unknown Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Frederick Banks v. United States Attorney
as 09-6096
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, COUNSELOR JACKSON, BRUCE PEARSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-4264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-3801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008hc02117
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
