Cases 1 - 10 of 1,355
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
ZHAO LIQIN
Defendant:
MARTIN JAY MCDANIEL and Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Zhao v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Liqin Zhao
Defendant:
Martin Jay McDaniel and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bohanon et al v. Riverside Resort and Casino Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv08068
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohanon and Stephanie Dobner
Defendant:
Riverside Resort and Casino Incorporated, Riverside Resort and Casino LLC, Matthew C Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05243
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America, et al. v. McDaniel, et al.
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LARRY ANTHONY MCDANIEL
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05223
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Autumn Freeman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mike Faust, Abraham Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Nicholas McDaniel
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
