Cases 21 - 30 of 1,018
Gilberto L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10564
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhummad v. McDowell et al
as 4:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Willie Murry JuQan Demetrices Muhummad
Defendant:
Shalla McDowell, Karma Thorn, Ridgle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Aubry v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2023cv02400
Petitioner:
Marcus Aubry
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vickers v. Mcdowell et al
as 1:2023cv01646
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lavelle Vickers
Defendant:
C O Mcdowell, Unknown Correctional Officer, C Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McDowell v. Dallas County, Texas
as 3:2023cv02543
Plaintiff:
Christopher McDowell
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04101
Petitioner:
Willie McDowell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Maurice McDowell v. Campos et al
as 2:2023cv08680
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice McDowell
Defendant:
Sgt Campos and Hawthorne Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bazzo v. State of California et al
as 1:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Defendant:
State of California, CDCR, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
