Cases 31 - 40 of 2,783
United States of America v. McKenzie
as 24-910
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ZACKERY ALLEN MCKENZIE
Rumpler v. North Idaho College et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Laura Rumpler
Defendant:
North Idaho College, Tarie Zimmerman, Brad Corkill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean McKenzieIn re: Dean McKenzie
as 24-1289
Petitioner:
In re: DEAN MCKENZIE
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Blaney et al v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Mary Blaney and Frances Lombardi
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Town of Oyster Bay, Carnell T. Foskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENZIE v. COWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
DEAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
DR. KAYON AYTON COWELL, BEATRICE PYE and MICHAEL M. MCKENZIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. MCKENZIE et al
as 2:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCOTT MCKENZIE and THE MACKENZIE FAMILY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McKenzie v. Robertson
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dale McKenzie
Defendant:
Daniel Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Allard et al v. Bonneville Power Administration, et al
as 6:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allard, Vicki Allard, trustee of Allard Family Trust Dated May 8, 2013 and others
Defendant:
Joyce Marie Mills, Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water & Electric Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
McKenzie County, ND v. United States, et al
as 24-1177
Plaintiff:
McKenzie County, ND
Defendant:
United States of America and Department of Interior
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
