Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Thomas, Jr. v. Prine et al
as 1:2026cv03325
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Jr. James Prine, Margaret Chapura, Everlyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Metcalf v. Daz, et al.
as 26-3731
Plaintiff:
DENZELL MAGIC METCALF
Defendant:
DAZ, Correctional Officer and WARDEN
Larry Thomas, Jr. v. James Prine, et al
as 26-11981
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES L. PRINE, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, BRIAN KEMP and others
Murphy v. Subramanian et al
as 3:2026cv00695
Plaintiff:
Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
Guhan Subramanian, Dominick P. Zarcone, Andrew C. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Metcalfe v. PRINCIPLE AUTO GROUP, LLC d/b/a PRINCIPLE TOYOTA,
as 2:2026cv02561
Plaintiff:
Casey Metcalfe
Defendant:
PRINCIPLE AUTO GROUP, LLC d/b/a PRINCIPLE TOYOTA,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04583
Plaintiff:
Frank Miller, Jr, Chicara Latimore-Petras, Ricky Head and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kessler v. Buelt et al
as 3:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ginger Lea Kessler
Defendant:
Diana Samuelson Buelt, Miranda Metcalf, Sydney Weldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Kline v. Hammock et al
as 4:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
James David Kline
Defendant:
Cassidi Hammock, Jeffrey Klotz, D. Douglas Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
