Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Cook et al v. Kang et al (TV3)
as 3:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Powell Cook
Defendant:
Rubin Lublin TN, PLLC, LNV Corporation , MGC Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Andrews v. MGC Mortgage, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage, Inc. and LPP Mortgage Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Johnson v. LPP Mortgage Ltd. et al
as 4:2017cv01504
Plaintiff:
Burton Johnson
Defendant:
LPP Mortgage Ltd. , MGC Mortgage, Inc. , Home Funds Direct and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Collings v. MGC Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01216
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Collings
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage, Inc. and LPP Mortgage, LTD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DiFrancesco et al v. LNV Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00980
Plaintiff:
Michele J. DiFrancesco and Alfred DiFrancesco
Defendant:
LNV Corporation , MGC Mortgage, Inc. and Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Emmanuel v. Charter Bank, NA et al
as 6:2016cv02165
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Y. Emmanuel
Defendant:
Charter Bank, NA , LLP Mortgage LTD , MGC Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell et al v. Cenlar Capital Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00814
Plaintiff:
Palas Mitchell and John Mitchell
Defendant:
Cenlar Capital Corporation and MGC Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sonya v. LNV Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv02796
Plaintiff:
Sonya R. Quinnett
Defendant:
LNV Corporation and MGC Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rebekah Gentry-Youngblood v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd., et al
as 16-6046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REBEKAH GENTRY-YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., JAMIE MORTON, MATTHEW GRAVES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
