Cases 21 - 30 of 158
Forsythe v. Carr et al
as 4:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Samantha Elizabeth Forsythe
Respondent:
Michael Carr, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norman v. Carr
as 3:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Alexis C Norman
Respondent:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carr et al v. Village of Stickney et al
as 1:2021cv06436
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr and Nicole Hensley
Defendant:
Village of Stickney, Officer William Ramski, Officer Jaczak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gauch v. Carr
as 21-11165
Petitioner / Appellant:
Amber Dawn Gauch
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden, FMC Carswell
Poff v. Carr
as 4:2021cv01288
Petitioner:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent:
Warden Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Timothy Littlejohn v. Governor, et al
as 21-13548
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE LITTLEJOHN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CARR, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Poff v. Carr
as 21-10991
Petitioner / Appellant:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden
Ellis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Director Caravjal et al
as 4:2021cv01087
Plaintiff:
Priscilla A Ellis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Director Caravjal, Federal Medical Center Carswell, Warden Michael Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis-Erkkila v. USA
as 21-50828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
