Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Evans v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Monroe G. Evans, III
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Craig Gable, Scott Busboom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carr v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hollowell v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Defendant:
Norman L. Barnett, Stephanie E. Gabay-Smith, Byron L. Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA A. ELLIS
Defendant:
FBOP, EVERTT COTTRELL, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv02836
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA ELLIS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, EUEREH COLTRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Carr
as 22-10839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexis C. Norman, and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden, FMC Carswell and Charles Langham, Medical Director, FMC Carswell
Poff v. Carr
as 22-10623
Petitioner / Appellant:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Michael Carr
Hamann v. Carr
as 4:2022cv00186
Petitioner:
Crystal Jean Hamann
Respondent:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Poff v. Carr
as 4:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
