Cases 1 - 10 of 48
United States of America v. Cash
as 26-1651
Defendant:
JONATHAN MICHAEL CASH, Cornea10 and meowofdeath0
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cash v. United States of America et al
as 2:2025cv00971
Plaintiff:
Martin Michael Cash
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Akeem King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cash v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv00971
Plaintiff:
Martin Michael Cash
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Akeem King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Cash v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2025cv01460
Plaintiff:
Martin Michaell Cash
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Postal Service and Akeem King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt Fed. Question: Tort Action
Cash v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Michael Cash
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11899
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL CASH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cash v. Payne
as 2:2021cv00160
Defendant:
Lieutenant Payne
Plaintiff:
Michael Cash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11938
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Michael Cash Thompson
as 2:2018mc00025
Respondent:
Michael Cash Thompson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
