Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Loveless v. White et al
as 3:2023cv02001
Defendant:
Flora E. Hutchison, Edward K. White, Michael Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Loveless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Cates v. Baltimore City Circuit Court
as 18-6633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CATES
Defendant - Appellee:
BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT, JUDGE JEANNIE JINKYUNG HONG, BALTIMORE CITY STATE'S ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Cates v. Baltimore City Circuit Court et al
as 1:2018cv01398
Plaintiff:
Michael Cates
Defendant:
Baltimore City Circuit Court, Jeanni Hong, Baltimore City State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cates v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2018cv01141
Plaintiff:
Michael Cates
Defendant:
Ricky Foxwell, Robert Traxwell, CDM, Dale Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Microsoft v. evaluesoftware.com et al
as 2:2013cv01081
Plaintiff:
Microsoft
Defendant:
evaluesoftware.com, Justin Cates, Michael Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Cates v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 2:2013cv02535
Plaintiff:
Michael Cates
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kee v. Diaz
as 2:2013cv01139
Petitioner:
Robert James Kee
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz and Michael Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singleton v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv00721
Plaintiff:
Kelvin X. Singleton
Defendant:
Michael Cate, L. McEwen, G. J. Janda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aron Douglass Castlin v. Greg Lewis et al
as 2:2012cv00269
Petitioner:
Aron Douglass Castlin
Respondent:
Michael Cate and Greg Lewis
Price v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation, et al
as 2:2011cv01315
Petitioner:
Gabriel Price
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation, Michael Cate and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
