Civil Rights Cases
Green v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff: Lawrence Jamalian Green
Defendant: John Wright Hickenlooper, Jr. , Michael Hartman and Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04243
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dixon v. State of Louisiana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00466
Plaintiff: Michael Dixon
Defendant: State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2011cv04026
Plaintiff: Michael Dixon
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco , Victoria Baldocchi and Stephen Rosen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Able v. Booth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00254
Plaintiff: Clayton Able, Jr.
Defendant: Janet Booth and Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moortgat et al v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2009at01249
Plaintiff: Stephen Moortgat and Alma Moortgat
Defendant: County of San Joaquin, Ralph Guerrero, Robin Heringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moortgat et al v. County of San Joaquin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02187
Plaintiff: Stephen Moortgat and Alma Moortgat
Defendant: County of San Joaquin, Ralph Guerrero, Robin Heringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02143
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Civil Rights None
Dixon v. Abla-Reyes et al
as 0:2008cv01191
Plaintiff: Michael Dixon and Michael Dixon
Defendant: Armando Abla-Reyes and St. Paul, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?