Cases 1 - 10 of 116
US v. Michael Felton
as 24-6217
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL FOSTER FELTON, a/k/a Mike
Foster v. Boneberg
as 24-10153
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg and Risk Management
Foster v. Boneberg et al
as 4:2023cv01205
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg and Risk Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27781
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FOSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Weaver et al
as 3:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik Weaver, Sarah McKnight, Scott Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Woodland Center Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv11534
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Woodland Center Correctional Facility, Jodi Deangelo, Michael Higginsbotham and others
Young v. Weaver, et al.
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik Weaver, Sarah McKnight, Scott Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv21296
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foster v. Casey Industrial, Inc. et al.
as 5:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Casey Industrial, Inc., Darrell Eads, Jr. and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
FOSTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20470
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FOSTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
