Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HOOTEN v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00484
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOTEN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, JACK HENDRIX, JERRY SYNDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOTEN v. BYRD, M.D.
as 2:2020cv00325
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, M.D.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOTEN v. WARDEN
as 2:2019cv00441
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WALKER et al
as 1:2019cv00797
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
VIRGINIA WALKER, BRYON HOOTEN and MICHAEL HOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Garrett v. Embrey et al
as 4:2017cv02492
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Garrett, II
Defendant:
Kyle Embrey and Michael Hooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooten v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03783
Plaintiff:
Michael Hooten
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOTEN v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00889
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., PAUL TALBOT and JAMIE THOMAS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Dominquez v. Anthony Martinez, et al
as 14-11003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VASQUEZ DOMINQUEZ, also known as Daniel Vasquez Dominguez, also known as Daniel V. Dominguez
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY MARTINEZ, Food Service Manager, MARY BITELA, Correctional Officer, EDWARD CRANDALL, Correctional Officer and others
Stokes v. Baker et al
as 2:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Forrest Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jamie L Baker, Michael Hooten, Darrell K Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
