Cases 81 - 90 of 978
WARK v. J5 CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
MICHAELA M. WARK
Defendant:
J5 CONSULTING, LLC and MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
JEB MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Rucker v. Farrar et al
as 6:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Steve Rucker, Jr.
Defendant:
Jonathan Farrar, Zachary Miller and Michael Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01043
Petitioner:
Michael Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv04281
Petitioner:
Michael Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22478
Plaintiff:
BRENT MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boatman v. Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 2:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Defendant:
Department of Children and Family Services, Correct Care Recovery Solutions, GEO Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Johnson v. USA
as 22-2898
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Allison et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81451
Plaintiff:
Barbara Allison, Martha Adkins, Greg Barber and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
