Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Michael Lane v. Gaye Karriker, et al
as 16-40400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYE L. KARRIKER, SHAUNA VESTAL, WILLIAM D. BROWN and others
Lane v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00145
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Karriker et al
as 6:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
Gaye L Karriker, Shauna Vestal, William D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Petitioner:
Michael Lane Brewer
Respondent:
Homer Bryson and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Lane v. John Rupert, et al
as 14-40977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. RUPERT, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Warden, LARRY S. DOLYE, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Assistant Warden, JEFF CATOE, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Assistant Warden and others
Orange v. Patterson et al
as 9:2014cv03614
Plaintiff:
Travis Orange
Defendant:
Dennis Patterson, Levern Cohen, Terrell Housey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lane v. John Rupert, et al
as 14-40782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. RUPERT, PATRICK COPPER, FRANK HOKE and others
Lane v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
John Rupert, Brad Livingston, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
John A Rupert, Patrick Copper, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
John A Rupert, Larry S Dolye, Jeff Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
