Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Lane v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv80474
Defendant: Inc Pfizer, Chattem Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Plaintiff: Acting Commissioner Michael Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sparks v. ISCI Warden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00115
Respondent: Al Ramirez and ISCI Warden
Petitioner: Michael Lane Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00099
Defendant: Chattem. Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., GlaxoSmithkline, LLC. and others
Plaintiff: Michael Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14918
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LANE HOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03130
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03072
Plaintiff: FRANCISCO AVILA, JACOB ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA THOMPSON and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff: Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Lane v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-40236
Respondent / Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL LANE
Michael Lane v. USA
as 19-70589
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: MICHAEL ROCKY LANE, AKA Michael Lane
Martin Dale Davis v. Barry County, Missouri
as 3:2018cv05103
Plaintiff: Martin Dale Davis
Defendant: Barry County, Missouri, Naomi Daniel, Michael Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?