Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Lane et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00832
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Plaintiff: Deborah Lane and Michael Lane
Defendant: Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff: Michael Lane
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Lane v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 23-2483
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL LANE
Defendant / Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BRASHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18214
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LANE BRASHER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Michael Breeden
as 23-4229
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL LANE BREEDEN, a/k/a Daewoo
Lane v. Lumpkin
as 23-20069
Petitioner / Appellant: Michael Lane
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20844
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MICHAEL LANE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02329
Petitioner: Michael Lane
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strain v. Ma'at, et al
as 6:2022cv02033
Plaintiff: Michael Duane Strain
Defendant: S. Ma'at, C J Williams, Samuel Owen Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act - Liability of US
Lane v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2022cv02634
Plaintiff: Michael Lane
Defendant: Cermak Health Services, Tom Dart and Doctor name unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?