Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Michael Lane v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 23-2483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Lane v. Lumpkin
as 23-20069
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Lane
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lane v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02329
Petitioner:
Michael Lane
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2022cv02634
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Tom Dart and Doctor name unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strain v. Williams et al
as 6:2022cv02014
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Strain
Defendant:
C J Williams, Samuel Owen Cross, Timothy Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lane v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk)
as 8:2021cv02806
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Lane
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Prator et al
as 5:2021cv03293
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lane
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Caddo Correctional Center, Robert Wyche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. MASON et al
as 5:2021cv03780
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANE
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. ISCI Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00115
Respondent:
Al Ramirez and ISCI Warden
Petitioner:
Michael Lane Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin Dale Davis v. Barry County, Missouri
as 3:2018cv05103
Plaintiff:
Martin Dale Davis
Defendant:
Barry County, Missouri, Naomi Daniel, Michael Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
