Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wilkins, et al v. Genzyme Corporation
as 22-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRINA WILKINS, JAMES BISHOP, LISA BISHOP and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENZYME CORPORATION
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC
D.J. et al v. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS et al
as 2:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
D.J., TONI CORDOVA, JOHN CORTINA and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS, ADEMOLA ABIOSE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILKINS et al v. GENZYME CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv10023
Plaintiff:
DARLENE COOKINGHAM, AMBER BRITTON, John Cortina and others
Defendant:
sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-Aventis SA, SANOFI CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILKINS et al v. SANOFI CORPORATION
as 4:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
DARLENE COOKINGHAM, JOHN CORTINA, THOMAS STANZIANO and others
Defendant:
SANOFI CORPORATION and SANOFI CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILKINS et al v. SANOFI CORPORATION
as 4:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
DARLENE COOKINGHAM, AMBER BRITTON, JOHN CORTINA and others
Defendant:
SANOFI CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hochendoner, et al v. Genzyme Corporation, et al
as 15-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA HOCHENDONER, EARL HOCHENDONER, ANITA BOVA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GENZYME CORPORATION
Defendant:
MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Hochendoner et al v. Genzyme Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv10739
Plaintiff:
Anita Hochendoner , Earl Hochendoner , Anita Bova and others
Defendant:
Genzyme Corporation and Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HOCHENDONER et al v. GENZYME CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
ANITA HOCHENDONER , EARL HOCHENDONER , ANITA BOVA and others
Defendant:
GENZYME CORPORATION and MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
