Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Metz v. Smith
as 9:2023cv06511
Plaintiff:
George D Metz, II
Defendant:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02146
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Smith
Respondent:
Warden L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Craft v. Fields et al
as 3:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Craft
Defendant:
Deputy Matthew Fields and Deputy Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
James v. Wright et al
as 2:2022cv01444
Plaintiff:
Anthony James and Anthony Glenn James
Defendant:
Lea Asheley Shannon Wright, Scarlette Wilson, Ptl. Offc. Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duty v. Runyon et al
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Danny Nathaniel Page Duty
Defendant:
Daniel Runyon, Jeffery Daniel Williams, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH and MICHAEL L. SMITH
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bland v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv01981
Defendant:
H. Johnson, Jade Pike, Caleb Primm and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00534
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Antonio Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
