Cases 1 - 10 of 34
STOUTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06665
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STOUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stout et al v. Sibrea et al
as 1:2019cv02956
Defendant:
Central Acceptance Company, Inc. and John F. Sibrea
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Allen, Sr. and Michael Stout
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stout v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04474
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michael Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Danial Dabish, et al v. James McMahon, et al
as 19-1941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVERNOIS VENTURES, INCORPORATED, BRIAN ABROU and DANIAL KHALED DABISH
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY THOMAS, JAMES MCMAHON, Detective, in his individual and official capacity, MICHAEL STOUT, Detective, in his individual and official capacity and others
Stout v. Ilcisko, et al.
as 1:2019cv01493
Defendant:
Daniel Sumpter, Dustin Thacker, Elyria Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fayad v. McMahon et al
as 2:2018cv13982
Plaintiff:
Ray Ahmed Fayad
Defendant:
Ronald Dupuis, Michael Moore, Hamtramck, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May et al v. Bader et al
as 2:2018cv13070
Plaintiff:
Charles Lake, Martez Roberson, Christina May and others
Defendant:
Michael Stout and Robert Bader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dabish et al v. McMahon et al
as 2:2018cv12467
Defendant:
City of Highland Park, B&G Towing Co., Gasper Fiore and others
Plaintiff:
Livernois Ventures, Inc., Brian Abrou and Danial Khaled Dabish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wassel et al v. Hamtramck, City of et al
as 4:2018cv11662
Plaintiff:
Omar Wassel and Mohamed Wasel
Defendant:
Hamtramck, City of , Sgt. Michael Stout , Anne Moise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
