Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Martinez-Silva v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cervantez v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maria Cervantez and Maria Concepcion Valenzuela Cervantez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Cris Love, Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Martinez v. J. Rivello, et al
as 22-2518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN RIVELLO, Superintendent SCI Huntingdon, K. KAUFFMAN, Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, J. SPYKER, Deputy Superintendent Specialized Services and others
Pratt v. Martinez
as 22-40274
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Herbert Hoover Pratt, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Miguel Martinez, Region IV Director and Gene Miller, Assistant Warden, McConnell Unit
Aiello v. Wainewright et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Daniel Aiello
Defendant:
Dale Wainewright, Brian Collier, Miguel Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01908
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Hall et al
as 2:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Gene Miller and Miguel Martinez
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hoover Pratt, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Hall et al
as 6:2021cv00192
Defendant:
Keith Gorsuch, Jane Doe, Stacie Crowley and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hoover Pratt, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMS v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2020cv01410
Respondent:
DION HUNTER, MARK MCLEAN, ANDRETTA GOLDEN and others
Petitioner:
ANDREW SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballentine, III v. Martinez et al
as 4:2020cv00686
Defendant:
Corey Furr, Tonya Lawson, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Garland Wayne Ballentine, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
