Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Perez v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson and City of Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Conway et al
as 1:2018cv05416
Plaintiff:
Kelda Lisette Gordon, Nicolas Stewart, Wali K. Bascoe and others
Defendant:
Lt. Col. Carl Sims and R.L. (Butch) Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00990
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1032
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sandel et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv08950
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sandel , Helia Gomez , Darwin Carbuccia Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Eduardo Perez Romero, Robert Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Quiles v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 5:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
Edwin Quiles
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Miguel Perez, David Uliano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quiles v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
Edwin Quiles
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport , Miguel Perez , David Uliano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales-Vazquez et al v. Perez-Martinez et al
as 3:2011cv01665
Defendant:
Miguel Perez-Martinez, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Perez-Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Julio A. Morales-Medina , Luz Gonzalez-Torres , Luz M. Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
