Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Acosta, Jr. v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raul Anthony Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Detention Officer Ortiz, Detention Officer Salazar, Sgt. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillman v. Lee
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Tyrus Tillman
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Lee
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillman v. Scott County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tyrus Tillman
Defendant:
Scott County Sheriff Department, Willie Anderson, Mike Lee and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tillman v. Scott County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
Tyrus Tillman
Defendant:
Scott County Sheriff Department, Willie Anderson, Mike Lee and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillman v. Mike Lee
as 3:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Tyrus Tillman
Defendant:
Scott County Sheriff Department and Sheriff Mike Lee
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Biro v. Chapman
as 1:2022cv00176
Petitioner:
Riley Biro
Respondent:
Mike Lee Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Darrel et al
as 4:2018cv00870
Defendant:
Elkin Darrel and Mike Lee May
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. May et al
as 4:2018cv00864
Defendant:
Bill Gilkey, Darrel Elkin and Mike Lee May
Plaintiff:
Joshua Arvil Kirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Gilkely et al
as 4:2018cv00862
Plaintiff:
Paul Douglas Adams
Defendant:
Jenifer Keener, Mike Lee May and Bill Gilkely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Brightwell et al
as 4:2017cv00728
Plaintiff:
Chad W Norman
Defendant:
Danny Brightwell and Mike Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
