Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Samant v. Cerner Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
Mohit Samant
Defendant:
Cerner Corporation, David Feinberg, William Zollars and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131 Americans With Disabilities Act
Daniel v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mitchell Daniel
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HERZ v. BAYH et al
as 1:2015cv00434
Defendant:
U.S. SEN. EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
SRIVASTAVA v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2013cv00134
Defendant:
AARON-RUBEN-NELSON MORTUARY, MARY MORIARTY ADAMS, AFNI, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
DALE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2012cv01886
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DALE
Defendant:
GOVNER MITCHELL DANIELS, JR., ATTORNEY: MR. RAHUL E. PATEL, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALE v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2012cv01672
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DALE
Defendant:
MITCHELL DANIELS, RAHUL E. PATEL, MATTHEW SYMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Defendant:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Adam-Wesley Powell v. Ingalls Police Department, et al
as 12-2343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM-WESLEY POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
INGALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STATE OF INDIANA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, c/o Mitchell Daniels, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
