Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Monk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Monk, Ronald Lee Grubb, David Keith Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Monk v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Barbara C Monk
Defendant:
United States, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cheron Y Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lucas Bradley Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Murray, Paul Monk, Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Talley
Defendant:
Bill J Murray, Paul Monk and QCHC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Lamar et al
as 2:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Richardson, O Walker, Tomlin and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Hines et al
as 2:2020cv01190
Defendant:
Monk, Hines, Cutts, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhite v. Parker et al
as 7:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Jameson T. Parker, Marcus Haynes, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tingle v. St. Clair County, Alabama et al
as 4:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Pell City, Alabama, Terry Surles, QCHC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason B Tingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
