Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Monk v. Morris
as 8:2016cv02817
Plaintiff:
Louis Monk, Jr.
Defendant:
Tiffany Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu Services, Incorporated v. Melvin Frazier, et al
as 16-31035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CANTU SERVICES, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
MELVIN LEE FRAZIER, STATE OF LOUISIANA WORKFORCE COMMISSION, RENEE ELLENDER ROBERIE, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Clemens v. Mount Clemens Community School District et al
as 2:2016cv11444
Plaintiff:
Renee Clemens
Defendant:
Mount Clemens Community School District , William A. Pearson , Mount Clemens Community Schools Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRE v. MONK et al
as 1:2015cv02192
Plaintiff:
FYNALLE FRE
Defendant:
CHARLES MONK , DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and MURIEL E. BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv14113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01574
Plaintiff:
LINETTE MONK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES OF D.C. DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH REHABILITATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
