Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pryor v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
James C. Pryor
Defendant:
J. Gilley, Ms. Landon, Mr. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Singleton, Marcus v. Mr. Brooks et al
as 3:2021cv00792
Plaintiff:
Marcus O. Singleton
Defendant:
Librarian Mr. Brooks and Business Officer Mr. Eting
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner, Glenn v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
Glenn T. Turner
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Mark Kartman, Heidi Brown and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suane v. Shah et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Remy Suane
Defendant:
John M Froehlich, Wexford Health, Dr. Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marigny v. Hopkins County Jail Administration et al
as 4:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Sundie Thomas, Hopkins County Jail Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Delloyd Lawon Marigny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Swisher et al
as 3:2020cv00533
Defendant:
Mr. Dudek, A. Williams, Mr. Wannack and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Poarch et al
as 1:2019cv01276
Defendant:
Mr. Brooks and Ms. Poarch
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Thomas et al
as 5:2019ct03191
Defendant:
Mr. Brooks, Mr. Widley, Eddie Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
