Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stevenson v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Cordarryl Stevenson
Defendant:
Alex Maldonado, Ms Walters and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
David Firewalker-Fields v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID NIGHTHORSE FIREWALKER-FIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, sued Individually and Official Capacity and IVAN GILMORE, Warden
Defendant:
E. WITT, Grievance Coordinator and Ombudsman Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity, SGT. RIDDICK, Night Sergeant Housing 2 Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity, ISRAEL HAMILTON, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity and others
DeAtley, et al v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 19-1372
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA ORTIZ, Investigator, MICHAEL MILLER, DAVID ZUPAN and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS J. AURELIO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN DEATLEY
Aurelio, et al v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 19-1362
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA ORTIZ, Investigator, MICHAEL MILLER, DAVID ZUPAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. AURELIO
Plaintiff:
ALAN DEATLEY
Barnes v. DSS et al
as 3:2018cv01567
Plaintiff:
Monique Barnes
Defendant:
DSS, Tina Kirfler, Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Boyd v. Walters et al
as 2:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M Boyd
Defendant:
Ms Walters and Cline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Dion Hutchins
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, Ms. Rudy, Ms. Blunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
