Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Latko v. Lochard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv04277
Plaintiff: Edward Latko
Defendant: Hughes Lochard, Lisa Logsdon, Philip Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Consumer Opinion LLC v. Frankfort News Corp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05100
Plaintiff: Consumer Opinion LLC
Defendant: Frankfort News Corp, Frankfort Herald News Corp, Hearst Media LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Prosperity Systems, Inc. v. Ashraf
as 1:2015cv03887
Plaintiff: Prosperity Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Syed Muhammad Ashraf
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Type: Contract Franchise
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00533
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad Ashraf, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73965
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD ASHRAF, AKA Muhammad Ashraf Khan, NAILA ASHRAF, AKA Naila Gul and MUHAMMAD AWAIS, AKA Muhammad Awais Khan
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
In re Terrorist Attacks on Sep
as 11-3556
Defendant / Appellee: Guld and African Center, Salman Al-Ouda, The Saudi High Relief Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Hector Flamenco
In re Terrorist Attacks on Sep
as 11-3556
Plaintiff - Appellant: Hector Flamenco
Defendant - Appellee: Yeslam Binladin, Abdulrahman Bin Mahfouz, African Muslim Agency and others
In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
as 1:2011cv02281
Plaintiff: Hector Flamenco
Defendant: Yeslam Binladin, Abdulrahman Bin Mahfouz, African Muslim Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Brown
as 11-419
Petitioner - Appellant: Muhammad Ashraf Ali
Respondent - Appellee: William D. Brown, Superintendent
Ali v. Brown
as 10-11
Petitioner: Muhammad Ashraf Ali
Respondent: William D. Brown, Superintendent

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?