Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02066
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MVM, Inc. v. SOC Inc.
as 1:2008cv00909
Plaintiff: MVM, Inc. and MVM, Inc.
Defendant: SOC Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01699
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Joseph Laffey v. James Plousis, et al
as 08-1936
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH LAFFEY
Defendant - Non-Participating: HANSEL S. TORRIERO
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES T. PLOUSIS, In His Individual Capacity and DONALD RACKLEY, In His Individual Capacity
Defendant - Dismissed_USCA: MVM INC
Boone v. MVM, Inc.
as 08-1074
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVE A. BOONE
Defendant - Appellee: MVM, INC., a California corporation that does business in Colorado
MVM Inc. v. Rodriguez
as 3:2007cv02197
Plaintiff: MVM Inc.
Defendant: Marcial Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv03124
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MIRMEHDI et al v. ASHCROFT et al
as 1:2007cv02031
Plaintiff: MOHAMMAD MIRMEHDI, MOSTAFA MIRMEHDI, MOHSEN MIRMEHDI and others
Defendant: JOHN ASHCROFT, JOHN ASHCROFT, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pena-Vega v. MVM, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02000
Plaintiff: Juan M. Pena-Vega
Defendant: MVM, Inc., Dina Evens and Insurance Company A-Z
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00227
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?