Cases 1 - 10 of 134
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pastor v. JVS Madden Health Center
as 1:2023cv16242
Plaintiff:
Ariel L. Pastor
Defendant:
JVS Madden Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Madden v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2023cv14163
Plaintiff:
Maura Madden
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Titus Henderson v. Jason Aldana, et al
as 23-2612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON ALDANA, BRIAN CHAPMAN, KEVIN MADDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barnes v. Madden Mental Health Center
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Howard Barnes
Defendant:
Madden Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Madden v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
Joseph Madden
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, TRACY BERRY, LAURA KLOIMWEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas A. Russell, et al v. Zimmer, Inc.
as 22-2529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS A. RUSSELL, M.D.,, PATRICK BURKE, AMANDA KIELY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ZIIMMER INC. and ZIMMER, INC.
PRICE v. TOLBERT et al
as 2:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
BRICE PRICE
Defendant:
RUSSELL TOLBERT, ZATECKY, CRABB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
