Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Trontez MahaffeyIn re: Trontez Mahaffey
as 24-5330
Petitioner:
In re: TRONTEZ MAHAFFEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv10897
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Mahaffey v. Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Trontez Mahaffey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington, City of Lexington, Warden David Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Muhaffey v. USA
as 2:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Trontez Mahaffey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sweeney et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv01569
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-60, Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sweeney and Bryan Marshall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
USA v. Trontez Mahaffey
as 19-6061
Defendant / Appellant:
TRONTEZ MAHAFFEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paupp v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv00054
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee , Jennifer K Moody , Shaun K Shepherd and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B Paupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahaffey Tent & Awning Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2017cv02783
Not Classified By Court:
Jimmy Moore
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Mahaffey Tent & Awning Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Mark Mahaffey v. Debra Scutt
as 14-2124
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK MAHAFFEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
