Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25132
Plaintiff:
MARCUS COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmis v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
David Holmis
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Loren Cooley, Jason Reusch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marcus Cook v. Captain Gains, et al
as 22-10334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
GAINS, CAPTAIN, NEAL, LIEUTENANT MR., MCAUTHOR, Sergeant Ms. and others
Cook v. Gains et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Captain Gaines, Lieutenant Mr. Neal, Sergeant Ms. McAuthor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv16848
Plaintiff:
MARCUS COOK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73117
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRIAR et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03265
Plaintiff:
LARRY TITTLE, KEITH ACKERMAN, ENACE LOCOCO and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Friar et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02248
Plaintiff:
Larry Tittle, Keith Ackerman, Enace Lococo and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cook v. McBriar et al
as 1:2018cv04426
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Ms. Ash, John Does 1-9 and Mr. McBriar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
