Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Marcus Hunter v. Harold Reep
as 23-7078
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS DEVAN HUNTER, a/k/a Versa Divine
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD REEP
Marcus Hunter v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
as 23-6904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS DEVAN HUNTER
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, TODD E. ISHEE, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and others
Divine v. Buchholtz et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Versa Divine and Marcus Devan Hunter
Defendant:
Peter R. Buchholtz, Kimberly D. Grande, Harold Reep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Reep
as 1:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Marcus Devan Hunter
Respondent:
Harold Reep
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunter v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2023ct03123
Plaintiff:
Marcus Devan Hunter
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Scotland Correctional Institution, Pasquotank Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
as 5:2023ct03087
Plaintiff:
Marcus Devan Hunter
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. SHANAHAN
as 1:2013cv00202
Petitioner:
MARCUS DEVAN HUNTER
Respondent:
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lay et al v. Spectrum Clubs, Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Marcus Devane, Brian Ducote, Alyssa Jaynes and others
Defendant:
Gold's Gym International, Inc. and Spectrum Clubs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HUNTER v. HAYES
as 1:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DEVAN HUNTER
Defendant:
MARK E. HAYES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
