Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Haynes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00366
Petitioner:
Marcus Haynes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05731
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilhite v. Parker et al
as 7:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Jameson T. Parker, Marcus Haynes, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2019cv05383
Plaintiff:
James Neposchlan, William Jones, John Green and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roderick Wright, et al v. Renzenberger, Inc.
as 17-80210
Respondent:
RODERICK WRIGHT, individuals on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, FERNANDO OLIVAREZ and MARCUS HAYNES, Jr.
Petitioner:
RENZENBERGER, INC., a Kansas corporation
Roderick Wright, et al v. Renzenberger, Inc.
as 17-80210
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RODERICK WRIGHT, individuals on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, FERNANDO OLIVAREZ and MARCUS HAYNES, Jr.
Defendant - Petitioner:
RENZENBERGER, INC., a Kansas corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-20678
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abad et al v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company et al
as 7:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Gabriel, Marlow Hilton, Alexander Abad and others
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00840
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
