Cases 81 - 90 of 116
BAILEY et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05372
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BAILEY , STACY BAILEY BAILEY , KELLIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relation
Rodny Bailey et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv07251
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp, Easton-Bell Sports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kellie Bailey, Rodney Bailey, Stacy Bailey Bailey and others
Williams v. Cain
as 2:2012cv01162
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tuck et al v. Crossroads RV, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Tammy Tuck , Marcus Williams , Cornelius Acker and others
Defendant:
Crossroads RV, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tuck et al v. Crossroads RV, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tammy Tuck , Marcus Williams , Cornelius Acker and others
Defendant:
Crossroads RV, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Marcus William
as 11-4558
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Ramon McGraw v. Berry Sims, et al
as 11-2859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Berry Sims, Pulaski County Circuit Judge, Kent Krouse, Public Defender, Gary Arnold, Saline County Circuit Judge and others
Williams v. Epps
as 2:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv03492
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Qasem et al
as 2:2011cv11080
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thompson
Defendant:
Isam Qasem and Marcus Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
