Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Estate of Doris Holt v. Horry County, South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant: DORIS HOLT, Estate of, RODNEY KEITH LAIL and IRENE SANTACROCE
Plaintiff: JAMES SPENCER, SOUTHERN HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, RICKY STEPHENS and others
Defendant - Appellee: HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALBERT ALLEN, JR. and others
James Spencer v. Horry County, South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1666
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES SPENCER
Plaintiff: RODNEY KEITH LAIL, IRENE SANTACROCE, SOUTHERN HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL STEVEN HARTNESS, HAROLD STEVEN HARTNESS, ANCIL B. GARVIN, III and others
: , and
Lail et al v. United States of America, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00977
Plaintiff: Rodney Lail, James B Spencer, Irene Santacroce and others
Defendant: United States of America, The, N John Benson, Phil Celestini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAIL et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff: RODNEY LAIL, IRENE SANTACROCE, JAMES B. SPENCER and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, PAUL GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stephens v. Wyeth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00630
Defendant: Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc and others
Plaintiff: Marguerite Stephens, Marguerite Stephens and Marguerite Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Stephens v. Wyeth et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2009cv01544
Plaintiff: Marguerite Stephens, Marguerite Stephens and Marguerite Stephens
Defendant: Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Ricky Stephens v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 08-1962
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICKY STEPHENS
Plaintiff: RODNEY KEITH LAIL, JAMES SPENCER, IRENE SANTACROCE and others
Defendant - Appellee: HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALBERT ALLEN, JR. and others
Defendant - None: CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH SC, MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, WARREN GALL, individually and in his official capacity as an officer with the Myrtle Beach Police Department and others
Irene Santacroce v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 08-1966
Plaintiff - Appellant: IRENE SANTACROCE
Plaintiff: RODNEY KEITH LAIL, JAMES SPENCER, RICKY STEPHENS and others
Defendant - Appellee: HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALBERT ALLEN, JR. and others
Defendant - None: CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH SC, MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, WARREN GALL, individually and in his official capacity as an officer with the Myrtle Beach Police Department and others
Marguerite Stephens v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 08-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARGUERITE STEPHENS
Plaintiff: RODNEY KEITH LAIL, JAMES SPENCER, IRENE SANTACROCE and others
Defendant - Appellee: HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALBERT ALLEN, JR. and others
Defendant - None: CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH SC, MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, WARREN GALL, individually and in his official capacity as an officer with the Myrtle Beach Police Department and others
James Spencer v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 08-1965
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES SPENCER
Plaintiff: RODNEY KEITH LAIL, IRENE SANTACROCE, RICKY STEPHENS and others
Defendant - Appellee: HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALBERT ALLEN, JR. and others
Defendant - None: CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH SC, MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, WARREN GALL, individually and in his official capacity as an officer with the Myrtle Beach Police Department and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?