Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Murray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Mary Murray
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mary Murray v. Abco Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-72269
Defendant:
Abco Industries, Inc
Plaintiff:
Mary Murray
Loney v. Soc. Security Administration et al
as 1:2008cv02321
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Loney
Defendant:
Soc. Security Administration, Michael J. Astrue, James Howard Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Murray v. Lafayette Insurance Company
as 2:2008cv02079
Plaintiff:
Mary Murray
Defendant:
Lafayette Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MURRAY v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72269
Plaintiff:
MARY MURRAY
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray et al v. Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00843
Plaintiff:
Gene Murray, Gene Murray, Gene Murray and others
Defendant:
Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
