Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crawford et al v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2019cv00403
Plaintiff:
Mark Crawford, Ira Jerome Ross and Larry King
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Sandy McCain and James M LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford et al v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2018cv00824
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Unknown Defendant and Sandy McCain
Plaintiff:
Mark Crawford, Ira Jerome Ross and Larry King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. CoreCivic, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01126
Plaintiff:
Mark Crawford
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Charlie Peterson and Pamela Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. USA
as 6:2016cv00294
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. CRAWFORD et al.
as 3:2015cv00368
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CHARLES JONES
Defendant:
MARK CRAWFORD, EBONY O HARVEY, VILCHEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADET v. CREWS et al
as 3:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
KERBY CADET
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, JANE DOE and MARK CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Ramey et al
as 2:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Roundtree Goodman
Defendant:
Robin Ramey, Sherry Cook, Valorie Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornell Daye v. David Ballard
as 11-6958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL F. DAYE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden (MOCC), in his official and individual capacities (Defendant #1), JASON COLLINS, Associate Warden of Programs, in official and individual capacities (Defendant #2), MARK CRAWFORD, Librarian, in his official and individual capacities (Defendant #3) and others
Daye v. Ballard et al
as 2:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Cornell F. Daye
Defendant:
David Ballard , Jason Collins , Mark Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daye, et al v. Ballard, et al
as 2:2010cv00941
Plaintiff:
Cornell F. Daye, John McLaurin and Aron Freeland
Defendant:
David Ballard, Jason Collins, McCloud James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
