Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kelly et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelly, Kelly's Management MS, Inc. and Southwest Concessions, Inc.
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hinton et al v. Cochise, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hinton, Vanessa Hinton, Veronica Hinton and others
Defendant:
Cochise, County of, Cochise County Sheriff, Doni Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunlap #124173 v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Dunlap
Defendant:
Douglas Ducey, David Shinn, Unknown Purden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JTH Tax LLC v. Kelly
as 3:2020cv05484
Defendant:
Mark Kelly
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Donahoe v. Kautter et al
as 3:2018cv05631
Defendant:
Betts, Patterson, Mines P.S., Ferris Beverly Donahoe, Albertsons and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crown Building Maintenance, Inc. et al v. SBM Site Service LLC.
as 3:2010mc80250
Plaintiff:
Crown Building Maintenance, Inc. , Mark Kelly and Michael McGee
Defendant:
SBM Site Service LLC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
