Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00848
Respondent:
Warden
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Saad
as 2:2017cv01445
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis King
Respondent:
J Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Saad
as 2:2017cv00065
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis King
Respondent:
J. Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2017cv00019
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis King
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REDFORD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv02083
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Respondent:
BARACK H. OBAMA, Loretta Lynch, Ron Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REDFORD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00906
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Respondent:
BARACK H. OBAMA, LORETTA LYNCH, RON JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kinney v. Miller
as 3:2014cv01136
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis Kinney
Respondent:
Amy Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damon Lewis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-11013
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMON MARK LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Damon Lewis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-10740
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMON MARK LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Damon Lewis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-10738
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMON MARK LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
