Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Moe v. Hotchkiss School
as 3:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
Mark Moe
Defendant:
Hotchkiss School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alcorn et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv03708
Plaintiff:
Ross Alcorn , Frank Aulrich , Bruce Bartak and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta Crop Protection, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATKINS v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
SHAQUANNA WATKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILBERTO RUIZ, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHEATHAM v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv08824
Plaintiff:
TERELL CHEATHAM
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF JERSEY CITY , ANDREW J. BARELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morgan Armstrong v. Michael Andrews, et al
as 15-12683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. ANDREWS, Honorable Judge, M. E. HALKITIS, RYAN MCGEE, Asst. State Attorney and others
Morgan Armstrong v. Michael Andrews, et al
as 15-12201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. ANDREWS, M. E. HALKITIS, RYAN MCGEE and others
Armstrong v. Andrews et al
as 6:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Morgan Allen Armstrong
Defendant:
Michael F. Andrews, M. E. Halkitis, Ryan McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Andrews et al
as 8:2015cv01185
Plaintiff:
Morgan Allen Armstrong
Defendant:
Michael F. Andrews, M. E. Halkitis, Ryan McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Andrews et al
as 8:2015cv01015
Plaintiff:
Morgan Allen Armstrong
Defendant:
Michael F. Andrews, M.E. Halkitis, Ryan McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S. v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
Maria S.
Defendant:
John Doe, Robert Roe, James Loe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
