Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marshall v. Abbott
as 22-40145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Lonnie Marshall
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Individual and official capacity, Warren Kenneth Paxton, Individual and official capacity, Skibell, Bohach & Archer, P.C. and others
Marshall v. Abbott et al
as 4:2021cv00384
Defendant:
Lynne Finley, Daniel Hodge, Colleton County 401st District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lonnie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv05196
Respondent:
Winter Carter and Mark Rusch
Petitioner:
Dustin Lonnie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marshall v. Abbott et al
as 2:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Office of Attorney General Child Support Division, Gregory Wayne Abbott, Skibell, Bohach & Archer, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lonnie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salazar v. Tri-Lam Roofing & Waterproofing, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00823
Defendant:
Tri-Lam Roofing & Waterproofing, Inc. and Mark Rusch
Plaintiff:
Raul Salazar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ward v. Collin County District Attorney et al
as 4:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Ward
Defendant:
Collin County District Attorney , Collin County Texas, Mark Rusch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Lamp v. Mark Rusch, et al
as 10-40641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER T. LAMP
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK RUSCH, Judge, 401st District Court, COLLIN COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE and JOHN ROACH, Collin County District Attorney
Lamp v. Rusch et al
as 4:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Lamp
Defendant:
Mark Rusch, Collin Co. Indigent Defense and John Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charette v. Roach et al
as 4:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Erick Drake Charette
Defendant:
John Roach, Gary Knapp, Mark Rusch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
