Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rondeau v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rondeau
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Mark W. Everson, NH Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RONDEAU v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv01360
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RONDEAU
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MARK W. EVERSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carlson v. Bush et al
as 6:2007cv01129
Plaintiff:
Roland Robert Carlson
Defendant:
George W. Bush, United States of America, Congress et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RONDEAU v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv00897
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RONDEAU
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MARK W. EVERSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at10293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. Counts et al
as 1:2007cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Anderson
Defendant:
Michael L. Counts, Cheryl Lynn Mixon and Mark W. Everson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
