Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Michael Hughes v. Mark Wolfe
as 20-1909
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK WOLFE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HUGHES
Brookman v. Reed-Custer Community School District 255 et al
as 1:2018cv07836
Plaintiff:
Richard and Allison Brookman, Richard Brookman and Allison Brookman
Defendant:
Mark Wolf, Michael Smith, Reed-Custer Community School District 255 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Wolfe
as 1:2018cv05895
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Hughes
Defendant:
Mark Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terry Martin, et al v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products, et al
as 17-3663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TERRY MARTIN, DELLA GROOMS, LINDA RUSSEL, aka Linda Russell and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BEHR DAYTON THERMAL PRODUCTS LLC, BEHR AMERICA, INC., CHRYSLER MOTORS LLC, nka Old Carco LLC and others
In Re: Terry Martin, et al
as 17-305
Petitioner:
In re: TERRY MARTIN, CLYDE BAXTER, ANNETTE BAXTER and others
Respondent:
BEHR DAYTON THERMAL PRODUCTS LLC, BEHR AMERICA, INC., CHRYSLER MOTORS LLC, nka Old Carco LLC and others
In re: Behr Dayton Thermal, et al
as 17-304
Petitioner:
In re: BEHR DAYTON THERMAL PRODUCTS LLC, BEHR AMERICA, INC., CHRYSLER MOTORS LLC, nka Old Carco LLC and others
Respondent:
TERRY MARTIN, DELLA GROOMS, LINDA RUSSEL, aka Linda Russell and others
Lipscomb v. Hines et al
as 5:2014cv05338
Plaintiff:
Ben C. Lipscomb
Defendant:
C. Greg Hines , Mark Kruger , Bob Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Wolf v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03556
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Wolf
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
