Cases 1 - 10 of 29
WOLF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27689
Plaintiff:
MARK WOLF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tristan Florendo-Ong v. IL-USA, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tristan Florendo-Ong
Defendant / Appellee:
IL-USA, Illinois-United States & Company, 116th/117th US Congressional 535 Members, 535 Members Bicameral Legislature, 177 Members IL G.A., 177 Members Bicameral Legislature and others
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Payne v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01826
Plaintiff:
Justin Payne
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Toni Prekwinkle, John Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOLFE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv32948
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe v. Lendis et al
as 3:2020cv00467
Defendant:
Lendis, Lafayette Indiana City of, Landiss and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Lendis et al
as 4:2020cv00047
Defendant:
Lendis, Lafayette Indiana City of, Landiss and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hughes v. Mark Wolfe
as 20-1910
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK WOLFE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HUGHES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
