Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01749
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee' Tate
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Ochonma
as 24-50158
Plaintiff:
Stacey Bernard Martin
Defendant:
Tonja Michelle Ochonma, Charles Ochonma, Linda Marquis, State Court Family Judge and others
Shepherd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ, FNU Chevalier, Jailyn LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. USA
as 3:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Marquis Devon McCray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepherd v. Saunders et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders, Michael White, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Taylor et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jamal Marquis Franklin
Defendant:
Naidja Taylor and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04795
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tidewater Dock, Inc. et al v. Perdido Energy, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07284
Plaintiff:
Tidewater Dock, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Perdido Energy, LLC, Marquis Resources, LLC, Cardinal Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11701 Admiralty & Maritime
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
