Cases 31 - 40 of 267
Williams v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2020cv02151
Defendant:
District Attorney Office, Melissa Marrero and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Benard Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00503
Respondent:
David Shinn and Arizona, State of
Petitioner:
Mark Angel Marrero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marrero v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 1:2020cv06532
Plaintiff:
Erwin Marrero
Defendant:
Dr. Sood, Sunday Cissel and Wexford Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Friend
as 5:2020cv00252
Petitioner:
Andres Marrero Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden Martin Friend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon v. Marrero et al
as 1:2020cv07105
Defendant:
Judge Sullivan and Judge Marrero
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2020cv07072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Feeder, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Defendant:
City Of New York, Corrections Officers Johns Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06779
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Phillipe Berkowitz, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollard et al v. Phillips
as 4:2020cv01868
Plaintiff:
Maksim Boiko, Tyrone Vickers, Jeremy Fooks and others
Defendant:
Warden Michael Phillips, Core Civic and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARRERO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2020cv03989
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
LUIS E. MARRERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marrero v. Gomez
as 6:2020cv00170
Petitioner:
Edwin Marrero
Respondent:
C. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
