Cases 1 - 10 of 3,194
Fucci, et al v. First American Title Insurance Company, et al
as 24-4051
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. FUCCI, an individual, AMBLESIDE PARK, a New Hampshire corporation, RICHARD HARDER, trustee of the Richard and Susan Harder Living Trust and others
Defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, KIRSTEN PARKIN, an individual, WILLIAM BOWSER, an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Collier v. Love et al
as 2:2024cv11213
Plaintiff:
Jammie Collier
Defendant:
Christopher Love, Kenneth Monroe, United States Marshal Service and others
DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S.P.S. OIG and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States v. Terry Campie
as 24-1901
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry Marshall Campie
US v. Marshall Scarborough
as 24-4224
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARSHALL RAY SCARBOROUGH
Greg Hale, et al v. ARcare, Inc
as 24-1726
Plaintiff:
Greg Hale, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melissa Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Alicia Gilmore, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant:
ARcare, Inc, originally named as ARcare
Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-2166
Plaintiff:
IVAN RENE MOORE
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, ASSET RELIANCE, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
